EARLY GRADES MATHEMATICS - MULUWA CHRISPIN
Early grades mathematics - by Muluwa Chrispin
Subtraction
is a fundamental mathematical operation that children must understand deeply in
order to develop strong number sense and problem-solving skills. It can be
introduced in two main ways: as "take away" and as "difference
or comparison." To help learners grasp these concepts effectively,
teachers often use the Concrete-Pictorial-Abstract (CPA) approach, which moves
from hands-on experiences with real objects to pictorial representations and
finally to abstract symbols. This structured progression supports conceptual
understanding and builds confidence in mathematical thinking. Understanding
these strategies enables educators to cater to diverse learning styles and
promote flexible thinking in the classroom.
To start with, subtraction can be understood in two main ways that
includes; take away, this means removing
a quantity from a whole. And difference
or comparison, this is finding how much more or less one quantity is
compared to another
To
build deep understanding, the Concrete-Pictorial-Abstract
(CPA) model is used. This model helps learners move from physical
manipulation of objects (concrete), to visual representations (pictorial), and
finally to solving using numbers and symbols (abstract). Each activity uses specific mathematical vocabulary that
reinforces key subtraction concepts (Singapore Ministry of
Education, 2001).
Subtraction as "Take Away"
At Concrete
Level (Using Real Objects)
And activity can be carried out as follows; provide each learner with 10 small objects
such as bottle tops, stones, or counters. Ask them to physically remove or
"take away" a certain number (e.g., 4), and count how many remain.
For instance, "You have 10 bottle tops. If
you take away 4, how many are left? Count the remaining bottle tops to find the
answer."
This
hands-on experience helps learners physically see and feel what happens when
something is taken away.
Vocabulary to Use will be like; “take away”, “subtract”, “remove”,
“left”, “remain”
These words help learners connect the physical act of removal to the concept of
subtraction.
Pictorial Level (Using Drawings or Pictures)
An activity
will be done as following;
draw 8 apples on the board or worksheet. Ask learners to cross out 3 of the
apples and count the number of apples that are not crossed out.
For Example;
🍎🍎🍎🍎🍎🍎🍎🍎 → Cross out 3 → 🍎🍎🍎🍎🍎
"Cross out 3 apples. How many apples are left that are not crossed
out?"
This
stage builds on the concrete experience and helps learners visualize
subtraction without using real objects.
Vocabulary to use; “cross out”, “subtract”, “left”, “minus”,
“remaining”
Abstract
Level (Using Numbers and Symbols Only)
Present
learners with subtraction equations such as 12 – 5 = ___ and ask them to
solve mentally or by writing.
For Example; "12 minus 5 equals what?" → 12 – 5 = 7
This
is the final stage where learners use only numbers and symbols to represent
subtraction, based on their previous experiences.
Vocabulary to use; “subtract”, “minus”, “equals”, “difference”,
“take away”
Subtraction as "Difference or
Comparison"
Concrete
Level (Comparing Two Sets of Objects)
Prepare
two sets of pencils. Set A has 9 pencils, and Set B has 5. Place them side by
side and ask learners, “How many more pencils does Set A have than Set B?”
For Example; "Set A has 9 pencils and Set B has 5. Count to find
out how many more pencils are in Set A than Set B." Learners count up from 5 to 9 to
find the difference.
This helps learners understand subtraction as the process of
comparing two quantities.
Vocabulary to Use; “more than”, “fewer”, “compare”, “difference”,
“how many more”
Pictorial Level (Comparing Drawing Heights or
Lengths)
Draw
two towers of blocks; one with 7 blocks and the other with 4 blocks. Ask
learners, “Which tower is taller? How many more blocks does the taller tower
have?”
For Example:
Tower A: 🟫🟫🟫🟫🟫🟫🟫
Tower B: 🟫🟫🟫🟫
"What is the difference in height between the two towers?"
It encourages
learners to make visual comparisons and determine the difference.
Vocabulary to use;
“difference”, “taller”, “shorter”, “compare”, “more“,
“less”
Abstract Level (Using Number Lines or Equations)
Use
a number line to find the difference between two numbers. For example, place a
marker at 9 and count up to 15. Ask: “What is the difference between 15 and
9?”
For Example:
15 – 9 = 6 Or use counting up: "Start at 9 and count up to 15:
10, 11, 12, 13, 14,
15 – that’s 6 jumps."
This concept, supports abstract thinking and builds fluency in recognizing
subtraction as finding the distance or gap between numbers.
Vocabulary to use; difference, subtract, how many more, gap,
between
Subtraction as "Difference or
Comparison"
Concrete Level (Using Real Objects
to Compare Two Sets)
Give learners
two separate piles of real objects, such as pencils, bottle tops, or sticks.
For example, Pile A has 9 pencils, and Pile B has 5 pencils. Ask the
learner to compare the two piles by physically counting each one and
identifying how many more objects are in
one pile compared to the other (Charlesworth, and Lind, 2012).
For Example; Count Pile A: 1, 2,
3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
Count Pile B: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Ask: “Which pile has more?” Then, “How many more does Pile A have than Pile B?”
To find the answer, take away 5 pencils from the 9 in Pile A:
9 – 5 = 4
So, Pile A has 4 more pencils than Pile B.
Vocabulary to use and
emphasize; “More than” – used to describe the larger quantity. “Fewer than” – used
for the smaller quantity. “Compare”
– to look at how amounts are different. “Difference”
– the result of subtracting one amount from another.
Pictorial Level (Using Drawings or Visuals to Compare)
Draw two vertical towers (bars or columns) using
blocks or squares on the board or paper. One tower has 7 blocks, the other has 4 blocks. Ask learners to visually compare the height
of the towers and identify how
many blocks taller one is than the other.
For example: draw; Tower A: 🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥
(7 blocks). Tower B: 🟦🟦🟦🟦
(4 blocks)
Ask: “Which tower is taller?” (Tower A). Then ask: “How many more blocks does
Tower A have?” Count the extra blocks above Tower B → 3 So, the difference in
height is 3 blocks.
Vocabulary to use and
emphasize; “Taller” – the tower with more blocks. “Shorter” – the one with fewer blocks. “Difference” – the
amount by which one is more or less than the other. “More or
Less” – general comparison words
Abstract Level (Using Numbers and Symbols Only)
Use a number line or write equations to help
learners calculate the difference between two numbers. For example, ask, “What
is the difference between 15 and 9?” Encourage learners to solve it by
subtracting.
For example; on a number line,
start at 9 and count up to 15:
·
From 9 to 10 = 1
·
From 10 to 15 = 5
Total jumps = 1 + 5 = 6
So, the difference is 6 Or
solve directly using an equation: 15 – 9 = 6 This shows that
the number 15 is 6 more than 9.
Vocabulary to use and
emphasize; “Difference” – the result of subtraction. “Subtract” – the
operation used. “How many more”
– used to ask about the comparison between two numbers. “Equals” – shows the result.
Finally, the three
Learners who worked out 67 - 23 the procedures can be explained as follows;
Learner A: Compensation Strategy
This learner
used a method called the compensation strategy, where numbers are adjusted to make the subtraction easier to perform
mentally. The idea is to round the second number to a "friendly"
number (usually a multiple of 10) and compensate by adjusting the first number
equally. This keeps the subtraction balanced and still gives the correct
result.
The learner noticed that 23
is not easy to subtract mentally because it is not a round number. To make it
easier, they added 7 to both 67 and 23,
turning the problem into 74 – 30. Since both numbers were
increased by the same amount, the final answer remained the same:
(67 + 7) – (23 + 7) = 74 – 30 = 44
This method relies on the principle
of equality: adding the same number to both the minuend (the number
being subtracted from) and the subtrahend (the number being subtracted) keeps
the difference unchanged.
For Example;
ask
learners to solve 52 – 19 using compensation. Guide
them to think: “19 is close to 20. If I add 1 to 19 to make 20, I must also add
1 to 52 to keep the problem fair.” So, the problem becomes: (52 + 1) – (19 + 1) = 53 – 20 = 33. By turning the subtraction
into round numbers, learners can subtract
faster and with less mental effort.
Key
Vocabulary includes; “Compensation” - compensation means adjusting numbers either up or down to
make mental subtraction easier. For example, adding 7 to both numbers in 67 –
23 changes the problem to 74 – 30, which is easier to calculate mentally. This
technique helps learners work flexibly with numbers and reduces calculation
errors.
“Balance” - balance refers to keeping the subtraction fair by applying
the same change to both the minuend and subtrahend. It ensures that the
difference between the two numbers remains the same, preserving the answer.
Understanding balance is important to avoid mistakes during mental adjustments.
“Minuend” - the minuend is the number you subtract from in a subtraction
problem. In 67 – 23, 67 is the minuend because it is the starting quantity
before taking away. Recognizing the minuend helps learners understand the
direction of subtraction.
“Subtrahend” - the subtrahend is the number being subtracted from the
minuend. In 67 – 23, 23 is the subtrahend because it represents the amount
taken away. Knowing this term helps learners identify the parts of a
subtraction problem clearly.
“Friendly numbers” - friendly numbers are
easy-to-work-with numbers, often multiples of 10 like 10, 20, or 30. They
simplify mental calculations because they reduce complexity in subtraction or
addition. Adjusting numbers to friendly numbers is a common strategy in mental
math.
Strengths of this strategy includes; encourages flexible
thinking about numbers,
This strategy pushes learners to think beyond fixed procedures by adjusting
numbers creatively. It develops number sense and helps learners see subtraction
as a flexible process, not just a rule to follow. Flexible thinking supports
problem-solving in different contexts.
Makes use of round numbers which are easier to
subtract mentally, Using
round or friendly numbers simplifies calculations by removing complicated
digits. This approach reduces cognitive load and speeds up mental math, making
subtraction more accessible, especially for larger numbers.
Helps learners who are strong in mental math and
number relationships, learners
with good mental calculation skills can benefit greatly from this strategy, as
it builds on their understanding of how numbers relate to each other. It
encourages them to use these relationships to simplify problems quickly (National
Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 2000).
Supports estimation and quicker calculations; the compensation method helps learners
estimate answers faster and perform calculations more efficiently. By rounding
numbers to the nearest ten or friendly number, learners develop skills useful
for real-life situations that require quick approximations.
On
the other hand, the weaknesses of the
strategy; it requires a clear understanding of number relationships and
equality, for compensation to work, learners must understand that adding
or subtracting the same amount to both numbers keeps the difference unchanged.
Without this knowledge, learners may apply the method incorrectly, leading to
wrong answers.
Learners may forget to compensate both numbers, which
leads to incorrect answers, a
common mistake is adjusting only one number in the subtraction, which changes
the actual difference. This oversight shows the importance of teaching balance
and double-checking steps during mental calculations.
May confuse younger learners who are still mastering
basic subtraction steps, for
beginners, the idea of changing numbers before subtracting can be confusing.
They often need concrete experiences with simple subtraction before moving to
compensation, as premature introduction might hinder understanding.
Less effective if the adjustment is a large number,
which can complicate the thinking, if learners add or subtract a large number to compensate, the
mental load increases and can cause confusion. Large adjustments reduce the
simplicity of the strategy and may slow down problem-solving instead of
helping.
Learner B: Decomposition / Place
Value Strategy
This strategy involves decomposing
or partitioning both numbers into tens and ones
to make subtraction easier. The learner first separates the numbers into their
place value components, then subtracts the tens from tens and the ones from
ones individually. After performing both subtractions, they combine the results
to find the final answer (Bruner, 1966). This method is especially useful for
learners who are still developing their mental math skills and need a
step-by-step process.
Activity;
Give
learners base-ten blocks or place value charts. Represent 67 as 6 tens and 7 ones, and 23 as 2 tens and 3 ones.
Ask them to: Remove 2 tens from 6 tens → 4 tens
Remove 3 ones from 7 ones → 4
ones
Then combine: 4 tens + 4 ones = 44
For example;
67 – 23
Break each number into its place value parts:
67 = 60 + 7 and 23 = 20 + 3
Now subtract each part separately:
(60 – 20) + (7 – 3) = 40 + 4 = 44
This hands-on activity helps
reinforce the link between number structure and subtraction.
Vocabulary;
“decompose” - to
decompose a number means to break it into smaller parts, such as splitting 67
into 60 and 7. This helps learners focus on manageable pieces of a problem,
making calculations easier and more understandable.
“Place Value” - place value refers to the worth of a digit depending on its
position within a number. For example, in 67, the 6 represents 60 because it is
in the tens place, while the 7 represents 7 ones.
“Tens and Ones” - two-digit numbers consist of two main
parts: tens and ones. Understanding these components helps learners to
accurately read, write, and manipulate numbers during operations like
subtraction.
“Subtract” - to subtract means to take away one number from another. This
operation finds the difference or remainder after removing a quantity from a
total.
“Combine” - combining means putting parts back together after breaking them
down. For example, after subtracting tens and ones separately, learners combine
the results to get the final answer.
Therefore,
strengths of this strategy include; encourages
a deep understanding of place value - using decomposition in
subtraction helps learners grasp the importance of each digit’s position. This
foundational skill supports all future math learning by building a strong
number sense.
Makes the subtraction process more visual and
organized, breaking
numbers into parts and subtracting each part separately allows learners to see
how numbers are structured. This organized approach reduces confusion and helps
clarify each step.
Supports mental calculation by training
learners to think in smaller parts, decomposing numbers into tens and ones simplifies the
subtraction process mentally. It encourages learners to solve problems piece by
piece instead of dealing with large numbers all at once.
Helps build confidence and flexibility in working
with numbers, mastering
this method boosts learners’ confidence, as they gain flexible strategies to
approach subtraction. This flexibility makes it easier to tackle a variety of
problems with ease.
Weaknesses
include; it can be time-consuming with larger or more complex numbers, for big numbers, breaking them down
and subtracting parts individually can take more time than using other faster
strategies, which might slow down problem-solving.
If learners misplace parts, it may lead to incorrect
answers, mistakes
can happen if learners subtract tens from ones or vice versa. This shows the
need for careful attention to place value to avoid errors (McClure,
2003).
Requires good attention to detail and a solid grasp
of place value, without
understanding place value deeply, learners may get confused during decomposition,
which affects accuracy. This method demands focus and clear understanding.
May not be efficient for quick calculations in
higher-level math, as
learners progress, they need faster methods. Unless this strategy is well
internalized, it might be too slow for advanced math tasks requiring quick
mental subtraction.
Learner C: Number Line/Counting On
Strategy
Instead of subtracting 23 from
67 directly, the learner asks, “How many more do I need to add to 23 to reach
67?” This strategy focuses on adding up from 23 to 67 rather
than directly subtracting, which is particularly useful when learners find
subtraction less intuitive. Subtraction as Addition: The
process is viewed as finding the difference by adding rather
than subtracting. This approach helps the learner conceptualize subtraction as
a distance between numbers on a number line.
For example; The learner is given
the subtraction problem 67 – 23 and chooses to solve it using
the number line strategy (or counting on).
On a number line, they start at 23
and count up (or "jump") until they reach 67. The
number line could be represented as: 23
→ 24 → 25 → 26 → ... → 67
The learner makes 44 jumps forward
to get from 23 to 67. Answer:
67 – 23 = 44 (the number of jumps taken from 23 to reach 67).
Vocabulary include; “Counting on” - the process of starting
from a smaller number and counting forward until you reach the larger number. “Number line” - a visual representation of
numbers in order, which helps in understanding their relative positions and
distances. “Jumps” - the individual steps or
increments counted on the number line, used to represent the addition process
in the counting on method. “Difference” - the result of
subtraction; it represents the gap or space between two numbers. “Addition of the difference” - in this strategy, the
learner adds the difference (i.e., the gap between numbers) to the smaller
number to find the larger one. “Distance”
- the concept of how far apart two numbers are, which in this
case is expressed by the number of jumps from 23 to 67.
Strengths of this strategy include; visualizing subtraction as a
difference, this method helps learners see subtraction not just as “taking away” but
as a measure of how much more one number is compared to another. It visualizes
subtraction as the distance between numbers on a number line (Haylock, and Cockburn,
2017).
Real-life contexts, the
strategy is helpful in everyday situations such as time and money. For example,
if a learner needs to figure out how much time has passed from 3:00 PM to 5:00
PM, they can "count on" from 3 to 5 (2 hours), or if they are adding
money (e.g., counting up from $23 to $67).
Building number sense, Counting
on is a natural strategy that builds understanding of number relationships and helps students get
comfortable with larger numbers.
On the other hand weaknesses; time-consuming with large gaps, when the numbers are large
(e.g., from 23 to 67), this method can be slow because the learner has to count
each individual jump or step, which may not be efficient for larger numbers (Anghileri,
2006). For example, counting from 23 to
100 would require many jumps, making it cumbersome.
Less efficient for
advanced learners, for learners who are already comfortable with
subtraction, counting on might seem inefficient because they would typically
use other strategies, like decomposition or compensation, to perform
calculations faster.
Error-prone in complex
problems, in problems where the difference is large or involves
multiple steps, the learner might lose track of their place or make mistakes
when counting up. This can become problematic when working with large numbers
or more complex mathematical problems (Van de and et al, 2019).
In
conclusion, teaching subtraction through the Concrete-Pictorial-Abstract (CPA)
approach and exposing learners to multiple mental strategies—such as
compensation, decomposition, and counting on provides a solid foundation for
mathematical understanding. These methods help learners move beyond rote
procedures to develop meaningful concepts of subtraction as both "take
away" and "difference or comparison." By using appropriate vocabulary
and allowing learners to engage with numbers in flexible and visual ways,
teachers can support diverse learning needs and promote confidence, accuracy,
and deeper reasoning in mathematics.
REFERENCES
Anghileri,
J. (2006). Teaching number sense. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Bruner,
J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Harvard University Press.
Charlesworth,
R., & Lind, K. K. (2012). Math and science for young children (7th ed.).
Cengage
Learning.
Haylock,
D., & Cockburn, A. D. (2017). Understanding mathematics for young
children: A guide
for teachers of children aged 3–7 (5th ed.).
SAGE Publications.
McClure,
L. (2003). Mental calculation strategies. NRICH Project, University of
Cambridge.
https://nrich.maths.org
NCTM
(National Council of Teachers of Mathematics). (2000). Principles and
standards for
school mathematics. Reston, VA:
NCTM.
Singapore
Ministry of Education. (2001). Primary Mathematics Syllabus. Curriculum
Planning &
Development Division.
Van
de Walle, J. A., et al (2019). Elementary and middle school mathematics:
Teaching
Developmentally (10th ed.). Pearson.
Comments
Post a Comment